• Users Online: 296
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Instructions to authors Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 151-156

Cross-sectional survey of resin-modified glass ionomer as dental restoration in Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
3 Department of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Amr Saad
Department of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjoralsci.sjoralsci_31_22

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGI) were developed to improve the properties of glass ionomer cement. Aim: The objective is to assess the knowledge of dentists in Saudi Arabia about properties, uses, and manipulation of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: An online questionnaire of 13 close-ended questions was disseminated on the internet. The survey investigated the preference for usage, cavity treatment, and both dentists' and patients' expectations. Results and Discussion: One hundred and thirty dentists have participated; and more than 99% are using RMGI occasionally with specific cases. The most common clinical use was found to be in cases of root caries and as a temporary filling material (84.6% and 61.5%, respectively). The most noticeable advantage was the fluoride release. However, the most undesirable disadvantage was the inferior esthetic compared to composite resin. It has also shown an average expectation regarding the retention, wear resistance, contouring, handling, and esthetics. Conclusion: Dentists had a good knowledge about the fluoride release ability of RMGI; however, most of the participating dentists were concerned about the esthetic and the handling of RMGI, and rarely use dentin conditioning and adhesive before RMGI placement.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed458    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded102    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal